These pages shows a whole essay as a typical example of how exactly to structure your content

Example academic essay

Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly appear in essays.

If the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?

The restoration associated with death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in the UK due to the rise that is recent violent crime. The complexities, effects and solutions to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime in order to increase circulation and also this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by considering the arguments put essay helper forward by those who work in favour for the death penalty and then by taking a look at the arguments in opposition to the theory.

The primary arguments in preference of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that individuals will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we need to think about the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support to your evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The idea of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there was a basic appeal in the simple phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights if they kill and therefore then it shows that we undervalue the right to live if punishments are too lenient. There are other points too in support of the death penalty, one of these brilliant being cost. It really is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for years at a time.

The arguments resistant to the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, it is basically wrong to kill and that as soon as the state kills it sends out the wrong message into the remaining portion of the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This will be an argument that is interesting could you teach children to not hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead demonstrate to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There’s also the fact you might execute innocent people. Innocent people can always be released from prison, however they can never be brought back from the dead. When people have been killed there isn’t any chance of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. Because of this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

To conclude, the arguments put forward by individuals who support or are resistant to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences as well as the real way individuals are brought up as they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this country many people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In cases like this it may be argued that parliament is at the forefront in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the clear message that killing is obviously wrong.

You ought to be able to note that this essay comprises of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why this issue is intriguing and relevant.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the difficulties and issues involved in the topic.
3. A plan regarding the essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which gives a main idea/argument which informs us what the whole paragraph is all about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward within the sentence that is topic.
3. Some personal input from the author analysing the points put forward into the topic sentence together with outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the points that are main gives an answer to the question.